Database Manual:
Part One


-
Database Manual
   Jurisdictions
   Table of Contents
   Part One
   Part Two
   Part Three
-
Search Syntax
   Boolean Searches
   Advanced Searches
   More Operators
-
Field Searching
   Check a Cite
   Party Search
   Cite Search
   Counsel Search
   Docket Search
   Author Search
   Date Search
   Panel Search
-
Browser Basics
   Toolbar Tour
   Cache Settings
   Java
   Adobe
   Uninstall
-
Power User Tips
   Keystrokes
   Advance Sheets
   History File
   Multisearching
-
Drop Down Menus
   Menus Explained
   Update Center
   Report a Resource

PART ONE: Welcome to TheLaw.net and Search Basics

If you've never conducted electronic searching, we think you will find it easy to learn and surprisingly efficient. If you have prior experience with Westlaw® or LEXIS®, that experience will be helpful, but remember, TheLaw.net is a different service. Even though each of these services can provide you with court cases, each has a unique way of doing it. That will affect your strategy and search construction.

Electronic Searching Strategy

Searching is a process, not an event. This should be your mantra when using TheLaw.net. Searching a library is not about spending time and mental energy formulating the "golden query" that retrieves your desired information in a single stroke. In practice, good online searching involves formulating a succession of queries until you are satisfied with the results. As you view results from one search, you will come across additional leads that you did not identify in your original search. You can incorporate these new terms into your existing query or create a new one. After each query, evaluate its success by asking:
  • Did I find what I was looking for?
  • What better information could still be out there?
  • How can I refine my query to find better information?
Issuing multiple queries can be frustrating or rewarding, depending on how long it takes you to identify the key material you need to answer your research problem.

Full-Text Libraries and Documents Defined

A full-text library is a collection of related whole documents assembled into a single searchable unit. The individual documents can be massive or minuscule, but they should bear some relation to each other (e.g., court opinions issued from the same jurisdiction). A full-text library is composed of smaller units called documents. When you search a database, you will retrieve documents that contain information that matches your query request.

Virtual Library: Searching Multiple Libraries

With TheLaw.net, your query can search in multiple libraries open at once; this is known as a virtual library. With a virtual library searching will be slightly slower than searching in a single library. In addition, documents retrieved from different jurisdictions are combined into one Hit List.

Indexing

TheLaw.net, Lexis and Westlaw all depend on the word as an essential tool to search and retrieve documents. And, like Lexis and Westlaw, TheLaw.net uses the principle of word indexing. During the publication process, an indexer goes through every document and creates an index of every word in every document and also tabulates how many times each word is used in each document. When you do a search, you are not really searching through the full-text of the documents; you are searching the word index of the documents.

Stop Words

As opposed to a keyword-based system, TheLaw.net uses a full-text retrieval software, meaning that it indexes every word in a document with the exception of Stop words. Stop words are those terms that are programmed to be ignored during the indexing and retrieval processes, in order to prevent the retrieval of extraneous documents. Generally, a stop word list includes articles, pronouns, adjectives, adverbs and prepositions ("the", "they", "very", "not", "of", etc.) that are most common words in the English language. Using stop words in full-text searching is vital in the context of Relevance Ranking, as described below.

Relevance Ranking

The most powerful weapon in the searcher's arsenal is Relevance Ranking. Simply put, relevance ranking lists a set of retrieved documents so that the documents most likely to be relevant are shown to you first. Remember, Relevance Ranking is not an indication of legal relevance. Relevance Ranking arranges documents based on the mathematical measurement of similarity between your query and the content of each record. What determines the likelihood of relevance? An analysis of the database is performed using a combination of the following indicators:

  • Breadth of Match - Documents containing more of the various query terms are weighted more relevant.
  • Inverse Document Frequency - Documents containing terms which occur less frequently in the entire database are weighted more relevant.
  • Frequency - Documents with a higher occurrence of a query term are weighted more relevant.
  • Density - The comparable length of retrieved documents is calculated to apply a higher relevancy weight.
In this analysis, stop words are ignored. This reduces the time spent processing your search and prevents an artificial boost of relevance to what are actually irrelevant documents, since "the" would probably retrieve every record in a database.

The researcher receives several benefits from Relevance Ranking. With the assistance of Relevance Ranking, you will find the most relevant documents in the shortest period of time. And, as you read down the Hit List, once you determine the documents are getting less applicable, you can stop reading results of this search because you know you have already viewed the most relevant documents. Finally…you don't have to be a computer expert who can compose the most complex of queries in order to find valuable information!   Next