|
 |
| CASE
LAW DATABASE |
Direct Searchable Access
The proprietary database of judicial opinions that
you have direct searchable access to via this software
is a viable alternative to U.S. Reports, the Federal
Reporter and most state reporters. Click
here for a list of
jurisdictions with backfile dates, that you have
unlimited, direct searchable access to.
Indirect Access
As our subscriber you will never again be without
a known Federal or state judicial opinion. If you
need opinions that predate a particular backfile
or originate from jurisdictions that are not yet
directly available to you, TheLaw.net
Virtual Assistant guarantees to overnight
requested items to your inbox; sooner, if you are
in a hurry.
Choose Your Search Path
Look for the button on the right hand side of the
banner at the top of every page that says: "CLICK
HERE TO SEARCH CASE LAW". (There's one at the
top of this page.)
Click this button to access
the proprietary searchable database of judicial
opinions that is included with your subscription
to TheLaw.net Search and Support Network. Our system
sees you using our software and self-authenticates,
which is a fancy way of saying it lets you in without
requiring a user name or password. One less thing.
There are no meters running and it is impossible
to incur an additional charge using TheLaw.net.
Relax and enjoy!
When accessing the Case Law Database, you may select
:
-United States Supreme Court only
-Federal Circuits: You are presented with the
option of searching any or all of the thirteen
United States Courts of Appeals and the United States
Supreme Court
-Federal Districts: YYou are presented with the
option of searching any or all of the 95
Federal districts. We also supplement
this increasingly valuable resource with unlimited
access to TheLaw.net
Virtual Assistant retrieval service which will
deliver via overnight email or sooner, ANY known
Federal or state judicial opinions which would obviously
include Federal district opinions.
-State Appellate: You are presented with the
option of searching any or all of the 50 states,
D.C., Guam and the United States Supreme Court
-Native American Tribal Courts: You are presented
with a page that allows you to search a collection
of opinions from the Chitimacha Tribal Courts, Colville
Confederated Tribes Court of Appeals, Coquille Tribal
Court, Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation Tribal Court,
Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde, Hopi Tribal
Court, Makah Tribal Court, Mashantucket Pequot Tribal
Court, Mohegan Gaming Disputes Court, Mohegan Tribe
of Indians Tribal Court, Navajo Nation Court, Puyallup
Tribal Court of Appeals, Saint Regis Mohawk Tribal
Court, and Tunica-Biloxi Tribal Court
-Specific United States Court of Appeals: You will
be presented with an interface that allows you to
perform a primary jurisdiction search that includes
any or all jurisdictions in our database that are
answerable to that specific circuit and the United
States Supreme Court. Accordingly, for example,
by selecting the United States Court of Appeals
for the First Circuit, you would be presented with
an interface that allowed you to search any or all
jurisdictions including the United States Supreme
Court, the United States Court of Appeals for the
First Circuit, the United States District Court
for the District of Maine, the United States District
Court for the District of New Hampshire and the
Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Rhode Island
Supreme Courts, respectively
Unpublished Opinions
TheLaw.net Corporation provides searchable access
to every unpublished opinion we can get our hands
on. Currently, in several jurisdictions, unpublished
opinions are citable as binding precedent. Other
jurisdictions permit citation to unpublished opinions
as persuasive precedent. Otherwise, unpublished
opinions are useful for purposes of gaining insight
into a particular court's viewpoint even though
the opinion may be stamped unpublished. Use TheLaw.net's
Courts
Menu to check the local rules regarding citation
to unpublished opinions in the jurisdictions that
are important to you. Unpublished opinions are designated
with the following symbol: [U] which will be located
to the left of the caption when viewing your search
results. Example: C04 [U] United States of America
v. Scott, 202 F.3d 261 (4th Cir. 12/13/1999)
Depublished Opinions
When an opinion is depublished, infomediaries rely
on the Courts to advise us that an opinion has been
depublished. If you are relying heavily on a recently
decided intermediate appellate court opinion and
you have any concern that it may have been depublished,
dial this opinion up to our support team via
TheLaw.net
Virtual Assistant and we will double check the opinion
to ensure that is has not been depublished. The
depublication of an opinion is an extremely rare
occurrence but one that is worth keeping in mind. |
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
